Vaughan Williams’s ‘modernist’ symphony

Vaughan Williams (and Foxy the cat)

Ashgate has just published an essay collection, British Music and Modernism, 1895–1960, edited by Matthew Riley. It promises to be an important contribution to the ongoing complication of the picture of modernism in music, which scholars of British twentieth-century music in particular have become increasingly interested in during the last decade.

My contribution to it is an essay on Vaughan Williams’s Fourth Symphony, a work much bandied about by critics (‘Vaughan Williams’s Antic Symphony’. In British Music and Modernism 1895–1960, edited by Matthew Riley, 175–96. Aldershot: Ashgate. 2010.). Those who suggest it is ‘modernist’ apply a traditional set of criteria to understand the term – surface dissonance, profoundly antagonistic approach to form, etc. – and then either laud Vaughan Williams as a member of (by implication) the only club worth joining in twentieth-century music, or else sideline the work as being untypical of its composer, who belongs more comfortably among the cow pats. By contrast, some critics point to the work’s recognizably classical form (it’s a symphony, in four movements, with a key signature, has themes and recognizable cadences, and so on). The only agreement is that we have to frame our response around the question ‘is it modernist or not?’

Drawing on readings of Stravinsky by Rudolf Stephan and Geoffrey Chew, I read the symphony as a parody both of modernist and classical processes, which ultimately refuses to be accommodated by either interpretation. I focus an important thread in British approaches to modernism, that of ridicule. Far from being – as some believe – a premoniton (in 1935) of coming total war or a sour reflection on hopes for humanity, the symphony is, I suggest, a kind of joke, thumbing its nose at the already sterile debate about whether modernism or something else should be pursued by ‘good’ composers (particularly those, like Vaughan Williams, of a politically progressive temperament). By feinting at modernist technique but subsuming it within a more conventionally conceived whole, this symphony refuses to accede either to the aesthetic or to the ideological premises of modernism. Yet its sardonic rejection of those premises, which is expressed (in part) in the mode of modernism, has of course simply reinscribed it within the whole discourse of modernism that it attempts to demolish, and in that sense it’s a failure. That’s why critics keep trying to reach a decision on whether it’s modernist or not. No surprise there. Satire tends, as Žižek observes, not to undermine but to support a prevailing ideology. But it’s a fascinating symphonic attempt to tackle a question about artistic style that still won’t go away.

References

  • Agawu, V. Kofi. Playing with Signs: a Semiotic Interpretation of Classic Music. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991.
  • Babbitt, Milton. ‘Who Cares if You Listen?’ High Fidelity 8, no. 2 (1958): 38–40.
  • Chew, Geoffrey. ‘Pastoral and Neoclassicism: A Reinterpretation of Auden’s and Stravinsky’s “Rake’s Progress”.’ Cambridge Opera Journal 5, no. 3 (1993): 239–63.doi:10.1017/S0954586700004055.
  • Cohn, Richard L. ‘As Wonderful as Star Clusters: Instruments for Gazing at Tonality in Schubert.’ 19th-Century Music 22, no. 3 (1999): 212–232.doi:10.1525/ncm.1999.22.3.02a00020.
  • Darcy, Warren. ‘Bruckner’s Sonata Deformations.’ In Bruckner Studies, edited by Timothy L. Jackson and Paul Hawkshaw, 256–277. New York: Cambridge University, 1997.
  • ——— . ‘Rotational Form, Teleological Genesis, and Fantasy-Projection in the Slow Movement of Mahler’s Sixth Symphony.’ 19th-Century Music 25, no. 1 (2001): 49–74. doi:10.1525/ncm.2001.25.1.49.
  • Fanning, David. Nielsen: Symphony No. 5. Cambridge Music Handbooks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
  • Forte, Allen. The Structure of Atonal Music. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1973.
  • Grimley, Daniel M. ‘Landscape and Distance: Vaughan Williams, Modernism, and the Symphonic Pastoral.’ In British Musical Modernism, 1890–1940, edited by Matthew Riley and Paul Rodmell. Aldershot: Ashgate, in press.
  • ——— . ‘Music, Ice, and the “Geometry of Fear”: the Landscapes of Vaughan Williams’s Sinfonia Antartica.’ Musical Quarterly 91, no. 1–2 (2008): 116–50.doi:10.1093/musqtl/gdn027.
  • Harper-Scott, J. P. E. Edward Elgar, Modernist. Music in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
  • ——— . ‘Elgar’s Deconstruction of the Belle époque: Interlace Structures and the Second Symphony.’ In Elgar Studies, edited by J. P. E. Harper-Scott and Julian Rushton, 172–219. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  • ——— . ‘“Our True North”: Walton’s First Symphony, Sibelianism, and the Nationalization of Modernism in England.’ Music & Letters 89, no. 4 (2008): 562–589. doi:10.1093/ml/gcn083.
  • Hepokoski, James A. ‘Fiery-Pulsed Libertine or Domestic Hero? Strauss’s Don Juan Reinvestigated.’ In Richard Strauss: New Perspectives on the Composer and His Music, edited by Bryan Gilliam, 135–75. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1992.
  • ——— . ‘Gaudery, Romance, and the “Welsh” Tune: Introduction and Allegro, Op. 47.’ In Elgar Studies, edited by J. P. E. Harper-Scott and Julian Rushton, 135–171. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  • ——— . Sibelius, Symphony No. 5. Cambridge Music Handbooks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
  • Kennedy, Michael. The Works of Ralph Vaughan Williams. London: Oxford University Press, 1980.
  • Kinderman, William. Beethoven. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
  • ——— . ‘Thematic Contrast and Parenthetical Enclosure in Beethoven’s Piano Sonatas, Opp. 109 and 111.’ In Zu Beethoven, edited by Harry Goldschmidt and George Knepler, 43–59. Berlin: Verlag Neue Musik, 1988.
  • Monelle, Raymond. The Sense of Music: Semiotic Essays. Princeton, N.J., and Woodstock: Princeton University Press, 2000.
  • Schoenberg, Arnold. Style and Idea: Selected Writings of Arnold Schoenberg. Edited by Leonard Stein. London: Faber, 1975.
  • Stephan, Rudolf. ‘Zur Deutung von Strawinskys Neoklassizismus.’ In Vom musikalischen Denken: Gesammelte Vorträge, edited by Rainer Damm and Andreas Traub, 243–248. Mainz: Schott, 1985.
  • Walton, Chris. ‘Auf der Suche nach der Moderne in England.’ In Klischee und Wirklichkeit in der musikalischen Moderne, edited by Otto Kolleritsch, 256–269. Vienna: Universal, 1994.
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s