Cablegate and speaking truth to power

Vince Cable

Vince Cable has been caught on tape by some extremely disreputable right-wing journalists. His claim that his resignation — which might come sooner now than he’d intended — could bring down he government has rightly been ridiculed, but it isn’t so very far from the fantasies of many journalists and interested citizens.

We tend to think that embarrassing government ministers, or otherwise making their lives uncomfortable, is an important part of our democracy. This principle is the basis of the BBC’s interrogative style. John Humphrys, Jeremy Paxman and the like consider that they are giving politicians a hard time when they ask pointed questions. When Wikileaks shares embarrassing secrets from those in power, the left is excited by the very fact of the discomfort it causes politicians (the fact that the ‘secrets’ are already well known is immaterial).

I’m not disputing that these are good things. It’s a pleasure to see the powerful squirm, but we must reflect on what this actually achieves. If Cable resigns, he may be replaced by David Laws, and the rightwards movement of the Tory-led government will be aided considerably. But even if we could somehow embarrass the entire cabinet into resigning, what would be the effect? We would still have a Tory government, still be plunging into the abyss. We still would not have an opposition party willing to oppose the liberal market ideology that has long been our parliamentary consensus. Even if we embarrassed the entire House of Commons into resigning, who do we think would replace them at the next election? Saints? Or more politicians with an investment in so-called free markets, the myth of the perpetual economic crisis, and so on.

The mode of attack against our politicians works perfectly well within the confines of the system. It threatens nobody (how many times did Peter Mandelson return from the grave?) and certainly does no harm to the political setup. It is not, in a word, violent enough to change anything. Journalism of this kind, on telly or in press or other media, is a handy tool of the status quo. We feel empowered, but we are not. It’s as if we think we’ve turfed the royal family out of Buckingham Palace when all we’ve done is a shit on the doorstep.

Julian Assange’s interview with Humphrys on the Today Programme this morning was a classic example of our asinine public discourse. Humphrys tried to undermine Assange on the basis that he might have had lots of sex. Assange revealed himself as a rank misogynist in his suggestion that women get into ‘a tizzy’ about rape. This was of course play day for Humphrys, a scratching stick for him to idle away the time until a real politician came along (though the political abilities of Assange should not be underestimated). But this is the model: embarrass the interviewer by lobbing undermining accusations at them. This was Ben Brown’s tactic when interviewing Jody McIntyre, the man with cerebral palsy who the police twice dragged from his wheelchair (Brown’s accusation was that McIntyre was rolling towards the police).

Outrage at Brown’s interview, with which I have total sympathy, should also be directed at the standard journalistic response to power, not because it is too violent in that case (as was the case with McIntyre) but because it is not violent enough. It doesn’t change anything.

Another revealing element of Cablegate is the idea that dear old uncle Vince has revealed his true nature as a critic of the government’s nasty right-wingery. Secretly, behind the scenes, he’s fighting a just cause, we are to believe. Yet again this is false. We are generally committed to the idea that what happens in private is more real than what happens in public — more really reflective of our true soul. The opposite is the case. What is public is true. A man who beats his wife but says deep down he loves her is a wife-battering misogynist bastard, not a tender lover. An extermination camp guard who committed genocide by day but listened to string quartets by night is a genocidal murderer, not a sensitive music lover. It is on the basis of their public, not private, behaviour that we should judge people. Vince Cable proposed and voted for a staggering rise in tuition fees. What he said in private is immaterial. His actions in government make him right-wing. Less of the uncle Vince rubbish.



  1. “We are generally committed to the idea that what happens in private is more real than what happens in public — more really reflective of our true soul. The opposite is the case. What is public is true. ”

    Absolutely. Very well said. Other people will pay the consequences of Cable’s actions: his off-record opinions are merely the saving lies with which he appeases his own guilty conscience.

  2. I think you get away with the implied comparison although there’s always a danger of undermining your argument when you trigger Godwin’s Rule of Nazi Analogies! The structure whereby private virtue is used to justify public vice is identical.

    I liked Cable for speaking out against the dangers of the housing boom years before anyone else – but The Storm showed that he was profoundly committed to the free markets and any socially liberal principles he holds seem based on the goal of stability in the markets not on a profound concern for the plight of the disadvantaged. He may engage in a bit of socialist-lite tub thumping from time to time but Cable never had any more to offer than Capitalism with a Human Face.

  3. I agree with Prasit. Where are the Conservatives?It worries me gletary that the people who who got us into this unholy mess, in spite of the warnings they received, are the very ones who are now portraying themselves as the saviours of the worlds finances.The only answer they seem to have is the old failed medicine. Throw money at it, and it will all be better. I don’t believe it.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.